With change comes opposition. My action plan centers on getting all teachers to
base competency levels with technology programs that are essential for
communication, data tracking, and resources. The second piece is to challenge
all teachers to implement at least one Web 2.0 program or other student used
technology in their classroom.
Foreseeable challenges vary from teacher
apathy to the need for constant assistance. Some teachers lack basic computer
skills and will need more one on one time. Depending on the member and level of
teacher need, time constraints may present a challenge. Recruiting additional
staff to act as mentors should allow time constraint factors to decrease by
sharing the load.
Another possible major challenge is teacher apathy
toward trying something new in their classrooms with Web 2.0. The initial
surveys will allow teachers to select programs of interest. Hopefully by
allowing teachers to choose their own development and proving assistance, apathy
will be avoided.
The last major concern is network and technological
availability. We have had network issues which limited the number of students
who could be online at one time, and there is a limited number of computers
available. This summer our complete network infrastructure was upgraded which
should alleviate network overload. As for computer availability, the campus IT
person is reimaging, fixing, and locating all COWs so that we have a true view
on availability.
Wednesday, August 14, 2013
Saturday, August 3, 2013
Why focus on TEACHERS?
Teachers at Lanier have a history of low
technology fluency compared to other campuses within the district. Many teachers
are unaware or claim to be unfamiliar with pulling reports, aggregation of
data, ability to post/collect documents from googledocs, and lack of ability
with many other tools which are critical for success of students. The deficiencies
are a culmination of several factors. Lack of training, newness, infrequent
use, and even unwillingness to change procedures. Therefore, the goal of my action research
plan is to provide professional development and mentoring for teachers who self
identify as being deficient in these areas. In the past, there has not been a
person or program to support technology growth of teachers.
The action research plan begins with teacher
self-assessment of proficiencies with programs and interest in Web 2.0. Focus
groups will be held to determine why teachers feel they are deficient, what
they feel would be the best method of support, and which programs they are most
interested in developing. Once data has been collected and analyzed, I will be
meeting with the administrative team to develop mentoring/ professional
development schedule. At the end of the year, focus groups and surveys will be
administered again to determine teacher felt growth. During the year, mentor
and administrative observations will be made to monitor development of teachers
who identify as the highest need.
I hope to learn methods of supporting and
preparing teachers for success in utilizing technology and database programs so
that they can effectively use data available to address student needs, as well
as encourage use of technology to make learning more engaging. I want to increase
student achievement by increasing achievement of teachers.
Based on findings of this research project, I hope to establish a campus which feels more supported and confident in their ability to use technology for student learning. Success of the project may also lead to recommendations that will better prepare new teachers to use necessary programs at the beginning of their career. They are typically left to learn technology programs on their own while facing an already challenging learning curve of being a teacher.
Action Research Plan
SCHOOL VISION:
The school vision is to have all teachers meet base
competency levels with technological programs needed for instruction,
communication, and compilation/dissemination of data to improve effectiveness
and efficiency of teachers.
Action Steps
|
Person(s) Responsible
|
Timeline:
Start/End
|
Needed Resources
|
Desired outcomes
|
1. Initial survey
of teacher competencies
|
Medina Willis
Campus teachers
|
Start: 8/19/2013
End: 8/30/2013
|
·
google survey
·
Teacher compliance
|
Collate results
of proficiency and need
|
2. Focus group
sessions
|
Medina Willis
|
Start: 8/19/2013
End: 9/13/2013
|
·
Survey analysis
·
Teacher volunteers
|
Determination of
support needed by teachers
|
3. Survey
analysis and results meeting
|
Medina Willis
|
Start: 8/23/2013
End: 9/20/2013
|
·
Administrative team
·
Proficiency and needs analysis
|
Determination of
which needs to focus
|
4. Implementation
of Professional Development and Mentoring
|
Medina Willis
Administrative team
|
Start: 9/16/2013
End: 05/2/2014
|
·
Teachers
·
Administration team
·
Schedule
|
-Increased proficiency
in required technology
-Increased use of
Web 2.0 tools in classroom for student learning
|
5. Peer
Observation and Walk Throughs
|
Medina Willis
|
Start: 9/16/2013
End: 05/2/2014
|
·
Teachers
·
Schedule
|
-Increased proficiency
in required technology
-Increased use of
Web 2.0 tools in classroom for student learning
|
6. Final
Evaluation surveys and Focus groups
|
Medina Willis
Campus teachers
|
Start: 5/5/2014
End: 5/30/2014
|
·
Google survey
·
Teacher compliance
|
Analyze teacher
viewed outcomes of additional supportand PD
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)